Are you OK with cookies?

We use small files called ‘cookies’ on Some are essential to make the site work, some help us to understand how we can improve your experience, and some are set by third parties. You can choose to turn off the non-essential cookies. Which cookies are you happy for us to use?

Skip to content

Rape and assault convictions overturned following DNA breakthrough

The Court of Appeal has today quashed a man’s rape and assault convictions after considering new evidence resulting from DNA testing.

Andrew Malkinson was sentenced to life imprisonment after being convicted of rape in 2004. After spending 17 years in prison, he was released from custody on licence in December 2020.

In April 2021, Mr Malkinson’s representatives from Appeal approached the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) with new DNA evidence. In consultation with experts, the CCRC devised a comprehensive forensic strategy to obtain the best possible evidence using modern DNA techniques.

The testing obtained a DNA profile on the victim’s clothing which matched another man on the National DNA Database, which led to the CCRC referring Mr Malkinson’s application to the court in January 2023.

Mr Malkinson had previously applied to the CCRC twice before, but the first application was made at a time before modern DNA evidence was available and the second concentrated on issues concerning the identification witnesses.

CCRC Chairman Helen Pitcher OBE said:

“We recognise that Andrew has had a very long journey to clear his name, but sadly the evidence that led to the CCRC referring his case only became available years after his conviction.

“We welcome the court’s decision to overturn Andrew Malkinson’s convictions on the basis of new DNA evidence.

“In the ever-changing world of forensic science, new evidence can come to light years after a conviction. We used our special powers to take advantage of DNA breakthroughs to find evidence that we considered could overturn this conviction.”

The victim in this case was attacked whilst walking home alone in the early hours of 19 July 2003. There was no DNA or other forensic evidence linking Mr Malkinson to the crime and the prosecution case relied mainly on identification evidence.

Following a trial at Manchester (Crown Square) Crown Court, Mr Malkinson was convicted, by majority verdict, on 10 February 2004.

The new evidence obtained by the CCRC improved upon the results obtained previously, enabling a search of the DNA database to be carried out.

The new DNA evidence found by the CCRC does not prove that the man on the DNA database committed these or any offences. The CCRC passed the new DNA evidence to Greater Manchester Police for them to consider further.


[Update 19/08/2023 – the judgment on Mr Malkinson’s appeal was delivered on 7 August 2023]

Notes to editors

  • Mr Malkinson previously applied to the CCRC in 2009. During that review, the CCRC reviewed the DNA analysis that had been undertaken previously and was advised by the Forensic Science Service that there was no real prospect of further testing producing any significant new evidence. Since the conclusion of that review in 2012, there have been significant improvements in forensic science, including the DNA testing which has led to this referral. That first review also concluded prior to the matching profile being added to the DNA database. A further application made in 2018 focused on the identification witnesses.
  • The CCRC is an independent body set up under the Criminal Appeal Act 1995. It is responsible for independently reviewing suspected and alleged miscarriages of criminal justice in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It is based in Birmingham and is funded by the Ministry of Justice.   
  • There are currently 11 Commissioners who bring to the CCRC considerable experience from a wide variety of backgrounds. Commissioners are appointed by the monarch on the recommendation of the Prime Minister in accordance with the Office for the Commissioner for Public Appointments’ Code of Practice.   
  • The CCRC usually receives around 1,400 applications for reviews (convictions and/or sentences) each year. Since starting work in 1997, the CCRC has referred around 3% of applications to the appeal courts.   
  • The CCRC considers whether, as a result of new evidence or argument, there is a real possibility that the conviction would not be upheld were a reference to be made. New evidence or argument is argument or evidence which has not been raised during the trial or on appeal.  Applicants should usually have appealed first. A case can be referred in the absence of new evidence or argument or an earlier appeal only if there are “exceptional circumstances”.   
  • If a case is referred, it is then for the appeal court to decide whether the conviction is unsafe or the sentence unfair. 
  • More details about the role and work of the Criminal Cases Review Commission can be found at The CCRC can be found on Twitter @ccrcupdate and Instagram the_ccrc