Commission refers the conviction of E to the Court of Appeal

The Criminal Cases Review Commission has referred the sexual abuse convictions of E to the Court of Appeal.

Mr E pleaded not guilty but was convicted in 2001 of a number of sexual assaults on children. He was sentenced to a total of seven years’ imprisonment. 

He appealed against the conviction but his appeal was dismissed. 

Having carried out a long and detailed investigation in the case, the Commission has referred Mr E’s convictions because it considers that various issues, including the non-disclosure of material that may have assisted his defence, raise the real possibility that the Court will quash his convictions.

This press release was issued by Justin Hawkins, Head of Communication, Criminal Cases Review Commission, on 0121 232 0906 or e-mail

Notes to editors

1. The Commission has replaced the applicant’s name with the letter E in order to protect the identity of individuals involved in the case. The letter should not be taken as an initial; when the Commission decides to anonymise a case, it does so by choosing the next letter in the alphabet following on from the last anonymised referral. The Court of Appeal will make its own decision about if/how to anonymise the case when the appeal is heard. 

2. The Criminal Cases Review Commission is an independent body set up under the Criminal Appeal Act 1995. It is responsible for reviewing suspected and alleged miscarriages of criminal justice in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It is based in Birmingham and is funded by the Ministry of Justice. 

3. There are nine Commissioners who bring to the Commission considerable experience from a wide variety of backgrounds. Commissioners are appointed by the Queen on the recommendation of the Prime Minister in accordance with the Office for the Commissioner for Public Appointments’ Code of Practice. 

4. The Commission receives around 1,000 applications for reviews (convictions and/or sentences) each year. Typically, around 4%, or one in 25, of all applications are referred to the appeal courts. 

5. The Commission considers whether, as a result of new evidence or argument, there is a real possibility that the conviction would not be upheld were a reference to be made. New evidence or argument is argument or evidence which has not been raised during the trial or on appeal. Applicants should usually have appealed first. A case can be referred in the absence of new evidence or argument or an earlier appeal only if there are “exceptional circumstances”. 

6. If a case is referred, it is then for the appeal court to decide whether the conviction is unsafe or the sentence unfair.