How are we doing?
We want to know how our website is working for you and where we can improve.Give feedback
On 20th July the House of Commons Justice Committee published a report entitled “Disclosure of evidence in Criminal Cases”. The CCRC was one of a number of organisations which had provided the Justice Committee with written submissions on the subject, in the course of the Committee’s inquiry. The Committee’s report was critical of the current practice of police and prosecutors in respect of disclosure, and again highlighted the problem of non-disclosure of relevant unused material in criminal cases. The Justice Committee report followed on from the July 2017 report “Making it Fair” – the result of a joint inspection by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate – into disclosure of unused material in volume cases in the Crown Court. That report had itself been highly critical of the approach of police and prosecutors to the disclosure process.
The CCRC has long recognised the significant problems in this area, and the CCRC’s Chair, Richard Foster, has highlighted the issue in successive Annual Reports to Parliament, explaining that: “a major cause of miscarriages of justice continues to be non-disclosure, at or before trial, of material which could have been of assistance to the defence” (Annual Report and Accounts 2017). Mr Foster has also written to the Law Officers, DPPs here and in Northern Ireland, and to senior figures in the police, highlighting the CCRC’s experience on the issue of disclosure, and stressing that disclosure problems are not only a recent phenomenon. Around one fifth of our referrals over the years (more than 130) to the Court of Appeal, including some of our most recent cases but also some of our earliest, have turned on non-disclosure.
The CCRC observes that other organisations – most notably the CPS and the Attorney-General’s Office – have recently undertaken review work aimed at live prosecutions, prosecutions which have recently been dropped by the CPS, and the operation of the disclosure regime overall. Although such work is vital and is to be welcomed, the CCRC considers that it is equally important for any review of disclosure to consider completed cases that have resulted in convictions. The CCRC’s Chair has emphasised this same point in a recent letter to the Attorney-General. It is this need to consider completed cases which has led the CCRC to devise the internal review which is discussed below.
The CCRC’s recent and ongoing work in connection with disclosure can be summarised as follows:
In relation to the CCRC’s internal disclosure review, although a number of details are still to be resolved, it has been decided that: